Critical Ren: all blow up small property?
Hu Xingdou
Ren, if not billionaires, then certainly not how many people will disregard him, his thoughts not as depth and height of a high school level.
Ren effort to emphasize the small property transaction law, property rights advocates to blow up all of the small room. He also, for example, with traffic lights, everyone can not be illegal, can not run a red light. and to encourage the legalization of small property rights is to encourage illegal. < br> seems that they are law-abiding citizens of the real estate business model.
just Xinhua News Agency June 11 has just released a report mm ; development consultant, I do not understand is why he spared careful everywhere, every step, show breaking bad laws, re-order process. If the small property there is a lack of legal support and even violates the law of the place, then we do not rules, the system with the times, adapt to modern trends, comply with the two-way flow of urban and rural populations, urban-rural integration, balanced development of the market economy.
the past, China's modernization is in the city on the island, the second per household registration system, dual financial system, dual financial system, tax system, land acquisition has created the system of the city's prosperity and depression in rural areas, so that a growing gap between urban and rural areas. And the process of modernization in the developed countries not only allows rural free city living, career, and allows freedom of the urban population to rural living, business, and ultimately led to economic growth in rural areas, promoting the development of urban and rural harmony.
why China can not break the legacy of planned economy dual household registration system, dual land system boundaries, rural and urban population, two-way communication, complete with market economy standards, and standards of modern civilization it?
can say that the legalization of small property ultimately achieve ;. First Farmers urban residents , 6 times, China has 15 times, 20 times, one of the reasons is that many urban residents in developed countries live in a rural or remote rural areas. Third, the government small portion of gold as the planning, management cost.
course, we do not encourage the current situation is no legal basis, over hill and dale, chaotic take private building house property. We advocate first through the planning, approval, in protect farmland, the environment under the premise of building house property. However, the small property has been built, most of it should be legalized, very few do not meet the planning, building safety performance is poor, affecting flood of diarrhea, can be removed.
Ren said the legalization of small property damage the interests of farmers, because farmers will occupy land, house sites, 18 million mu of arable land can not guarantee the national security of the lowest line, farmers will become displaced, not conducive to social stability.
Ren Zhiqiang, which in turn can become a joke.
dereliction of duty as long as local governments do not, do not continue not to act, perform their duties, the construction of house property to do the planning, approval, will not allow use of farmland , take a one homestead, never allow damage to the environment, only in reclaimed land, waste land, forest to build, then how can the occupation of cultivated land, farmers how could stray?
Ren said house property is not conducive to protecting the interests of home buyers and does not reduce the city's housing prices.
house property if the future of legalized, the interests of urban residents do not have guarantees? even have to pay a certain amount of collective land after the land transfer However, the proportion of transfer payments can not exceed 10% of housing must not be as high as the state-owned land, then the city's housing prices there are 30 to 40% of the price cut.
Ren said the legalization of small property rights will lead to two yuan real estate system is not conducive to government management.
Haha, dual housing system is the product of the current urban-rural dual structure, house property should be led to the legalization of one dollar of real estate systems, more favorable to the government management, how will the truth be confused?
this, I have to believe: the many irrational comments Ren is not a simple Business interest groups speak, he made a bigger name to copy, earn more money.
2007-7-13
(Hu Xingdou Studies on China, people's livelihood Economics Web site:
No comments:
Post a Comment